Skip to content

Rabbit Proof Fence Essay Music

Phillip Noyce's 2002 film Rabbit-Proof Fence, a hard-hitting Australian drama based on the real-life story of three members of the stolen generations who undertook a long and perilous on-foot journey to return to their mother, made considerably more money in the US than it did at the local box office. In Australia the film grossed about $3.7m; in the States it was almost $6.2m.

The US distributor Miramax advertised the film with the tagline: "What if the government kidnapped your daughter? It happened every week in Australia from 1905 to 1971." Eric Abetz, then special minister of state, was so incensed he demanded an apology from Noyce and threatened to use federal funds to finance a campaign against it.

"They're asking me to apologise for the poster?" the director shot back. "Maybe they could apologise to our Indigenous citizens."

While Noyce and the screenwriter, Christine Olsen, claimed Rabbit-Proof Fence was non-political in its intent, the film generated significant controversy in Australia – including attacks from high-profile conservative columnists. More than a decade later, audiences can perhaps revisit Rabbit-Proof Fence more thoughtfully.

What they’ll find is a film both powerful and pondering, hard-hitting and softly spoken, steered by three tremendous performances from actors who seem to reflect all its emotions on their young faces.

Based on a non-fiction book by the Indigenous author Doris Pilkington (whose mother Molly is one of the three main characters), the film was shot by veteran Christopher Doyle with delicate sun-kissed cinematography that gently soaks up outback settings, belying the traumatic story at the heart of it.

Molly (Everlyn Sampi), Gracie (Laura Monaghan) and Daisy (Tianna Sansbury) hopelessly try to run away from government representatives sent to snatch them and remove them from their family. The kids are taken to a boarding house where they speak in their native tongue and are told: “We don’t talk that jabber, we talk English.” They escape and follow the eponymous fence, using it as a guide to get home.

Kenneth Branagh plays AO Neville, a browbeating public servant who lingers ominously on the peripheries of the story, pounding his fists and hollering about eradicating “half-castes” from existence. If Neville adds a hard heart to the story, moments of kindness from random characters soften it. A woman who catches one of the girls stealing eggs gives them food and blankets. A camper provides advice that saves them a hundred or so miles of walking.

Rabbit-Proof Fence is strongest when it is character-oriented and reflective. During one fence-side moment, Daisy, the youngest of the three girls, sits on the ground complaining that her legs hurt. She is picked up and carried by Molly. It is one of several quietly affecting scenes that, in their own simple way, are more powerful than the film’s many moments of confrontation.

Another occurs at a remote train station where Gracie strays from the group. She strolls down overgrown train tracks and is interrupted by authorities, who arrive and bundle her into a car. Gracie stares out the back window at Molly and Daisy crouched behind a large wooden log. Molly says: “She gone. She not coming back.” So much of the film is encapsulated in that moment: the unbreakable bond between family; the trauma of being separated; the powerlessness of individuals in the face of government oppression.

There are precious few grey areas in Rabbit-Proof Fence. Noyce has no qualms about telling the audience what to feel and when to feel it. Moral interpretations get a little more complicated when the film contemplates the perverse logic ordinary Australians used to enforce stolen generation policies. “The bush natives have to be protected against themselves," says Neville. "If they would only understand what we are trying to do for them.” 

While films about Indigenous people often carry commentaries on racial prejudice and inequality (such as Walkabout, Toomelah, Red Hill and Australian Rules), it is rare for them to tackle these issues with such powerful polemic. It is impossible to watch Rabbit-Proof Fence and not be in some way affected by it.

The first words spoken in it – “this is a true story” – might have encouraged sceptics to retrieve the proverbial clipboard and red pen. But viewers who picked apart Rabbit-Proof Fence on the basis of factual discrepancies probably missed the point. Noyce’s ultimate aim was to find emotional truth, not only in the story of these three girls, but of countless members of the stolen generations who endured similar circumstances.

In The Film Rabbit Proof Fence, We, As The Viewer, Are Positioned To See Mr Neville As A Mostly Unsympathetic Character. How Has The Director, Phillip Noyce Used Various Techniques To Achieve This?

In the film "Rabbit Proof Fence", the character A.O. Neville is portrayed as a mostly unsympathetic character. The director, Phillip Noyce used the technique of camera angles to develop Neville's character as very authoritative and controlling of the other characters in the movie. The soundtrack, particularly the sound effects, are also used to develop Neville's character. He is shown to be very isolated from the suffering of Aborigines and only concerned for rules and regulations. The lighting and colour in both his office (where he is seen most of the time) and whilst making a presentation, are used in the film to demonstrate Neville's attitudes and beliefs. Finally, the editing of scenes contrasts Neville's actions and orders with those that he affects, creating a controlling, heartless character. However, despite all of this, he is not entirely unsympathetic. Neville believes that he is doing the right thing for the Aboriginal people. He is well-meaning and simply doesn't understand. It is the way he acts upon these beliefs that make him an unsympathetic character.

Noyce makes Neville appear very powerful and authoritative through his use of close-up and tilted-up camera angles. In the scenes where the viewers are introduced to Neville, he is shown sitting at his desk, going over paperwork with a very stern expression on his face. The camera is tilted up towards him, giving and impression of being very tall and imposing. As he reads through papers in a very serious manner, the camera is a very close to his face. His face fills the screen as he reads, making him appear very officious and dominating. Through these shots, the viewer is positioned to see Neville as a very harsh, cold and controlling person.

Furthermore, at the Moore River settlement, Neville is depicted checking the colour of the skin of the half-caste children to see if they are 'worthy' to attend school and live in white society. When Molly is called, the camera shows Neville from her point of view, and he appears to tower menacingly over her. From the viewpoint of a child, Neville is a very powerful and threatening. By seeing Neville from this angle, the viewers feels compassion for Molly as she faces Neville, and in turn see Neville as a cruel and oppressive character.

The sound effects in the movie develop Neville's character as authoritative and bureaucratic. When finalising paperwork to authorise the removal of the three children Molly, Daisy and Gracie, he stamps the paper. The loud thud of the stamp brings a sense of officiousness and finality. Concerned only with rules, money and bureaucracy, the viewer perceive Neville's character as cold, emotionless and unlikeable.

Before being introduced to Neville, the viewer is first shown the streets of Perth, where Neville's Office is located. Completely...

Loading: Checking Spelling


Read more

In what ways has the theory of the director as the 'author' of a film been used in film studies, and how and why has it been disputed?

2029 words - 8 pages Barthes claimed in 1977 that the author was dead and authorial intention had no place in criticism of texts, placing the importance of deciphering meaning fully with the reader (Barthes 1977 142 - 148). However, since 1948, many critics have focused on the director of films as the 'author' placing their own meanings and intentions within a film which was to be interpreted. This essay will look at how much this idea of the 'auteur' is used in...

Rabbit Proof Fence Review

915 words - 4 pages DateThe Director'New Experiences in Australian Film'Dendy Theatre346 George StreetBrisbane, QLD 4000Dear Sir, I am a film critic and I would like to recommend the film '

"One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich" by Alexander Solzhenitsyn - shows how various literary techniques are used to describe the development of Ivan's character.

662 words - 3 pages In "One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich," Alexander Solzhenitsyn clearly...

How are generic techniques used within the text "The talented Mr Ripley" by Patricia Highsmith to shape our response toward the character of Tom Ripley.

727 words - 3 pages The talented Mr Ripley is a crime novel by Patricia Highsmith which tells the mischievous tale of the main character Tom Ripley and his cunning plan used in evading the police. Even though we find that Tom is a suspicious man who commits fraud, murder and identity theft, we have been...

What has Dylan Thomas tried to achieve in this passage? How has he used language to try and achieve this?

514 words - 2 pages Under Milk Wood is a 1972 play written by Dylan Thomas. He has tried to set the mood of the play through the use of contrast, the use of sound devices as well as the use of a narrator.The use of contrast is a key factor in setting the mood of the play. Dylan Thomas has...

Rabbit Proof Fence (Myths and Untruths)

860 words - 3 pages Rabbit Proof Fence Essay There are many different points of view as to the historical accuracy of Rabbit Proof Fence, and they will all be displayed as best as possible in this...

Baz Lurhman describes 'Moulin Rouge' as "Audience Participation Cinema". Analyse the techniques he uses in the opening of the film, to remind us that "we are watching a movie"

4403 words - 18 pages Media Studies - Moulin RougeBaz Lurhman describes 'Moulin Rouge' as "Audience Participation Cinema". With closereference to the opening of the film, analyse the techniqueshe uses to remind us that "we are watching a movie"'Moulin Rouge' is a fanciful, feast for the eyes, provocative display of raw emotions,...

An essay analyzing the use of a variety of film techniques in the documentary, "Life And Debt" by Stephanie Black to convey her arguments to the viewer.

759 words - 3 pages In her acclaimed documentary, "Life And Debt", Stephanie Black uses a variety of film techniques to express the complexity of her arguments to the viewer. Using these techniques she conveys the ignorance of the tourists who continuously neglect the noble plight of the Jamaicans who work inhumane hours for inconsiderate, manipulative American corporations just to...

Unreliable Memoirs and Rabbit Proof Fence speech on journeys

1234 words - 5 pages "What people forget is a journey to nowhere starts with a single step, too."Good morning Ms McDonald and the rest of the class. The Chinese proverb says that to get through the hardest journey we need to take only one step at a time, but we must keep on stepping. It's a nice way of describing the journey forwards. Moving towards a goal. Achieving something. But after reading unreliable memories, and especially after watching

How are generic techniques used to shape our response to one character from the novel "Lord of the Rings": Fellowship of the ring by JRR Tolkien?

1631 words - 7 pages The novel, "The Fellowship of the Ring", by JRR Tolkien, deals with, amongst others things, themes of courage and friendship. Gandalf, in particular, portrays these characteristics very well. Gandalf is a wise and omniscient character who fights the forces of evil along with a group of friends in a classic good versus evil tale of heroism and courageousness. Through...

IN the novel, "A Bridge to Wiseman's COve" by James Moloney, the author cleverly uses symbolism to help us connect with the main character. Discuss how the author has used the osprey in this sense.

796 words - 3 pages 'A Bridge to Wiseman's Cove' by James Moloney, is about a fat, 15 year old boy, called Carl Matt who has been left by his mother and then sent to his aunt. Along the way he makes new friends, a new 'family' and finding the true Carl. You find that he has very...