Shakespeare's Hamlet - The Importance of the Ghost Essay
2768 Words12 Pages
Hamlet and the Non-expendable Ghost
All literary critics agree that the Ghost in Shakespeare’s tragedy Hamlet is not an expendable character. Without the Ghost the show could not go on. He is absolutely essential to the plot, to ever aspect of the drama.
W.H. Clemen in “Imagery in Hamlet Reveals Character and Theme” describes the pervasive influence which the Ghost’s words have on the entire play:
Perusing the description which the ghost of Hamlet’s father gives of his poisoning by Claudius (I,v) one cannot help being struck by the vividness with which the process of poisoning, the malicious spreading of the disease, is portrayed:
Sleeping within my orchard,
My custom always of the afternoon,…show more content…
A natural way to come to terms with the problem is obviously through the character that forces the dilemma upon Hamlet, that is to say, the Ghost. This is a particularly attractive approach, since it promises to bring the findings of modern research into Elizabethan demonology to bear directly upon the question of the nature of the Ghost and its message. It was apparently generally believed, among Catholics and Protestants alike, that a ghost could be dispatched into this world by either God or the devil, and consequently it became the duty of the receiver of its command to test it conscientiously before acting upon it. This is what we see Hamlet do when, in spite of his immediate conviction that it is an honest ghost he has seen, he arranges a trial of its veracity in the form of the play within the play. (117)
Thus is explained the rationale of the “play within a play” which is seen as necessary for the climax of the drama. To begin consideration of the Ghost, let it be said that the Ghost makes his appearance even before the play has opened. Marchette Chute in “The Story Told in Hamlet” describes the ghost’s activity prior to the opening scene of Shakespeare’s tragedy:
The story opens in the cold and dark of a winter night in Denmark, while the guard is being
Importance Of The Ghost In Shakespeare's Hamlet
The Importance of the Ghost in Hamlet
The stage presence of a ghost would have been familiar to an Elizabethan audience and so the appearance of the Ghost in 'Hamlet' carries some messages which are general - almost as though the ghost was a familiar symbol which evoked certain thoughts merely by being present. The Ghost in 'Hamlet' has a more specific role than that given to ghosts in general, however; it has a crucial part to play in the development of the plot. Thirdly, the interaction between the Ghost and Hamlet raises difficult questions regarding duty and free will, and as the trigger for much of the protagonist's anguished philosophising the ghost plays a key but problematic role as Hamlet's true adversary.
There are certain points to be made which are about ghosts in general. To a superstitious Elizabethan audience a ghost would be less improbable than it seems to a sceptical modern audience, but it would signify that something is wrong with the natural order. In Act I scene i the characters indicate that they believe this; the rational Horatio observes that "This bodes some strange eruption to our state"; Marcellus says that "Something is rotten in the state of Denmark". Even before the arrival of the Ghost the scene is tense - the first words ("Who's there?") are terse and nervy and even Francisco (whom we never see again and so perhaps represents the unseen population of Denmark) admits that he is "sick at heart". The presence of the Ghost, then, adds to this sense that something is deeply wrong - like many such superstitious entities (Horatio refers to other omens that preceded the death of Julius Caesar: the allusion to which makes the audience yet more uncertain of what is to happen) the mere presence of the Ghost is a potent symbol in stage notation.
The Ghost also plays an important role in the plot, however, and is not merely an atmospheric device. Initially the audience is presented only with the impending conflict with Norway as a source of these omens - when Horatio proposes that the preparation for war and a danger to the state might be the cause of the Ghost's presence, Bernardo agrees - "I think it may be no other but e'en so". It is not until the Ghost speaks to Hamlet in scene v that a more feasible source of the wrong in nature is proposed - that the old king was "sleeping, by a brother's hand / Of life, of crown, of queen at once dispatched". We as an audience cannot be sure that this is true (as Hamlet himself says later, "The spirit that I have seen / May be a devil") but it echoes Hamlet's anger and grief at his mother's swift remarriage as expressed in Act I scene ii and seems horrendously plausible. In terms of the Ghost's role in Hamlet the actual truth of his words are irrelevant; his principle plot importance is his exhortation to revenge -
"If thou didst ever thy dear father love...
Revenge his foul and most unnatural murder".
Hamlet's response is...
Loading: Checking Spelling0%